Rulings on Tribal Arbitration Funds Paying Blood Money
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54172/3gmvjd05Keywords:
Unintentional killing, social solidarity, temporal variablesAbstract
This study addressed the topic of contemporary alternatives in Libya regarding the payment of blood money (diyah) and its equivalents in light of Islamic Sharia. It clarified the meaning of blood money, its conditions, causes, amounts, and the types of cases where it is obligatory. It discussed the compensation for body parts and benefits, as well as the concept of "aqilah" (family responsibility) and its significance in cases of unintentional and intentional killing, and who bears responsibility for paying blood money. The study also revealed clear examples of contemporary alternatives and their applications in Libya, highlighting their adaptability to temporal and spatial changes, while emphasizing the importance of preserving Islamic principles that foster cooperation and social solidarity within the community. Since "aqilah" evolves with changes in time and place due to its foundation on assistance and support, wherever there is assistance, support, and sympathy, "aqilah" is found. Therefore, the study concluded that the concept of "aqilah" applies to some contemporary applications such as insurance companies, tribal funds, labor unions, ministries, and political parties, due to their commonality of assistance and cooperation.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright of the articles Published by Almukhtar Journal of Social Science (MJSSc) is retained by the author(s), who grant MJSc a license to publish the article. Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors and cite MJSSc as the original publisher. Also, they accept the article remains published by the MJSSc website (except in the occasion of a retraction of the article).





