Rulings on Tribal Arbitration Funds Paying Blood Money

Authors

  • Abubakr Saleh Ibrahim Filough Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Education, Omar Al-Mukhtar University – Derna Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54172/3gmvjd05

Keywords:

Unintentional killing, social solidarity, temporal variables

Abstract

This study addressed the topic of contemporary alternatives in Libya regarding the payment of blood money (diyah) and its equivalents in light of Islamic Sharia. It clarified the meaning of blood money, its conditions, causes, amounts, and the types of cases where it is obligatory. It discussed the compensation for body parts and benefits, as well as the concept of "aqilah" (family responsibility) and its significance in cases of unintentional and intentional killing, and who bears responsibility for paying blood money. The study also revealed clear examples of contemporary alternatives and their applications in Libya, highlighting their adaptability to temporal and spatial changes, while emphasizing the importance of preserving Islamic principles that foster cooperation and social solidarity within the community. Since "aqilah" evolves with changes in time and place due to its foundation on assistance and support, wherever there is assistance, support, and sympathy, "aqilah" is found. Therefore, the study concluded that the concept of "aqilah" applies to some contemporary applications such as insurance companies, tribal funds, labor unions, ministries, and political parties, due to their commonality of assistance and cooperation.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Filough, A. S. I. (2021). Rulings on Tribal Arbitration Funds Paying Blood Money. Al-Mukhtar Journal of Social Sciences, 39(1), 81-101. https://doi.org/10.54172/3gmvjd05

Similar Articles

1-10 of 56

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.