An Overview of the Concept and Use of Synonymy in English and Arabic

Authors

  • Alsedieg Elremali Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54172/vv9wyn56

Keywords:

Overview, the Concept, Synonymy, English and Arabic

Abstract

     Synonymy is a phenomenon that is widely spread in both English and Arabic. It is defined as "two or more lexical items which have the same meaning if they can replace each other without any change in the meaning of that context.  For example tall and high are synonymous in: a tall building and a high building whereas they are not in a structure such as: a tall boy, since high cannot be used instead of tall to indicate the same meaning. The same is true in Arabic, for example /alhrb/ 'war' and /alhiӠa/  'war' are conceptually synonymous but they are not in: /alhrbu annfsia/ and /alhiӠa annfsia/ 'psychological war'. Thus, synonymy remains a problem in terms of its identification and delimitation. Moreover, the relative size of synonymy in English as compared to Arabic has not been investigated yet to the best of my knowledge.

     Arab linguists fall in two opposing stands regarding synonymy: those who defend the existence of synonymy and justifies its existence with the richness of the bases in the language, the different dialects used to refer to the same object or to historical developments where obsolete words were replaced by new words that have the same meaning. The other group of linguists represents those who defend the non-existence of synonymy.

     The available information shows a lack of words identical in meaning and this confirms the absence of the so-called full synonymy, moreover, the partial synonymy is widespread in both languages, but more pronounced in Arabic than in English.

 

Author Biography

  • Alsedieg Elremali

    Lecturer in Applied Linguistics, Department of English, Faculty of Education, Omar El-Mukhtar University. El-Beida – Libya

References

Al-'awwa, S (1998). Al-wijuh wa al-nathair fi Al-Qura'an Al-Karîm. Cairo: Dar Al Shurûq.

Al-Mubarak, A. H. (1986). Fiqhu 'al-lughati. Basrah: Basrah University Press.

Al-shaya', M. (1993). Al-Furuq Al-Lughawya wa 'athruha fi T'theeir al-Qura'an Al Karîm. Riyadh: Al-'ubykan.

Al-Zaidi, G. (1987). Fiqhu 'al-lughati al-'arabyati. Mosul: Dar Al-Kutub.

Anis, I. (1965). Fi al-lahajâti al-'arabiyati. Cairo: Anglo Egyptian bookshop.

'Arar, M. A. (2002). Jadalu 'allafdhi wa 'alma'na: Derasa-t-u-n fi dalalti alkalemati a-l'arabyati. Amman: Wa'el press. Leabi, H. (1980). 'al-taraaduf fi 'al-lughati. Baghdad: Dar Al-huriya press.

Bint al-Shati', 'a'isha 'abd al-Rahman (1978). Al-e'jaz al-bayani lil-Qura'an wa-masɂ'il Ibn al-Azraq. Cairo: Dar al-Ma'arif.

Cranap, R. (1956). Meaning and Necessty. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Cruse, D. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ibn Manzur, (1956). Lisan – al'arab. Birut: Dar sider.

Lyons. J. (1981). Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: the University Press.

Nour El-Din, Al-Jaza’ri.(1380 HJ- Islamic Calendar). Furooq Al-Lughaat. Al-Najaf: Dar Al-Kutub AL-'ilmya.

Omar. A. M. (2001). Dirasat Lughawya fi al-Qura'anu Al-Kareem wa Qira'atihi. Cairo: 'alam al-Kutub.

Palmer, F. R. (1981). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

Saeed, J. (1997). Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.

Saleh, S. (1986). Dirasat fi fiqhu al-lughati. Bierut: Dar Al-'ilm lil-Malaeen.

Suyuti, Jalal al-Din. (1957). al-Durr al-manthûr fi al-tafsîr bi-al-manthur. Tihran.

Suyuti, Jalal al-Din. (1964). Bughyat al-wu'ah fi tabaqat al-lughawiyeen wa-al-nuhah (ed.) Muhammad Abu al-Fadhl Ibrahim. Cairo: Issa al-Babi al-halabi.

Suyuti, Jalal al-Din. (1969). Mu'tarak al-aqran fi I'jaz al-Qura'an. (ed.) Ali Muhammad al-Bajawi. Cairo: Dar al-Fikr al-'arabi.

Wafi, A.A. (1945). Fiqhu 'al-lughati. Cairo: Nahthet Miser press.

Yule, G. (2010). The Study of Language. Oxford: Oxford Univ

Downloads

Published

2017-12-31 — Updated on 2026-07-09

Versions

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

An Overview of the Concept and Use of Synonymy in English and Arabic. (2026). AL-Mukhtar Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.54172/vv9wyn56 (Original work published 2017)