تقييم جودة الحبوب لعشر سلالات من القمح الطري (قمح الخبز) Triticum aestivum L. مزروعة تحت ظروف الزراعة البعلية

Jamal O.  Nasr; Nasir  Khatab; Salha El-bakoush; Nadia Shmaila; Souad Zraig

doi:10.54172/9nreqa56

المؤلفون

Jamal O. Nasr Food Science & Techn. Research Department, Agricultural Research Center, Tripoli, Libya Author
Nasir M. Khatab Field Crops Department, Agricultural Research Center, El-Baidha, Libya Author
Salha M. El-bakoush , Food Science & Techn. Research Department, Agricultural Research Center, Tripoli, Libya Author
Nadia Shmaila Food Science & Techn. Research Department,Agricultural Research Center, Tripoli, Libya. Author
Souad Zraig Food Science & Techn. Research Department,Agricultural Research Center, Tripoli, Libya. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54172/9nreqa56

الكلمات المفتاحية:

قمح طري، سلالات، قمح الخبز، الزراعة البعلية، جودة الحبوب.

الملخص

هدفت الدراسة إلى تقييم جودة حبوب عشرة سلالات من قمح الخبز المزروعة بمنطقة العويلية بالمنطقة الشرقية بليبيا. أجريت التجربة في الموسم الزراعي 2020-2021 تحت ظروف الزراعة البعلية. أظهرت النتائج وجود فروق معنوية بين الأصناف المختبرة في صفات جودة الحبوب المتمثلة في الوزن النوعي ووزن الألف حبة ورقم السقوط والصلابة ومحتوى الرطوبة ومحتوى البروتين والجلوتين الرطب ومؤشر الجلوتين ورقم الترسيب. تمكنت السلالات المختبرة من استيفاء متطلبات الجودة للوزن النوعي ولوزن الألف حبة ولمحتوى الرطوبة ولمؤشر الجلوتين بمتوسطات 80.5 كجم/هكتولتر و43.3 جم و11.4% و83.1% على التوالي، بينما فشلت جميعها في تلبية متطلبات الجودة لرقم السقوط وصلابة الحبوب، وقد تمكنت السلالة EBW 22 من بين السلالات الأخرى من تسجيل أعلى قيمة لمحتوى البروتين والجلوتين الرطب بقيم 13.02% و26.3% على التوالي. وتجاوزت السلالة EBW 11 بشكل منفرد الحد الأدنى لمتطلبات الجودة لرقم الترسيب بقيمة 17 مل. ولم يتمكن أي من الأنماط الجينية المختبرة من امتلاك جميع خصائص الجودة المطلوبة والضرورية لصنع خبز جيد.

المراجع

AACC. American Association of Cereal Chemists (2000): Approved methods of the AACC, 10th Edition. 2000. methods 38-12, 44-15, 46-10, 55-30 and 56- 81. St. Paul, MN.

Abagandura, O. G. and D. Park. 2016. Libyan Agriculture: A Review of Past Efforts, Current Challenges and Future Prospects. Journal of Natural Sciences Research. 6 (18): 57- 67.

Acevedo, E., Silva, P. and Silva, H. 2002. Wheat Growth and Physiology. In B. C. Curtis, S. Rajamram and H. Gomez Macpherson, eds. Bread wheat improvement and production. Plant production and protection, Series No. 30. Rome, Italy.

Aissaoui, M. R. and Fenni, M. 2018 . Grain Yield and Quality Traits of Bread Wheat Genotypes under Mediterranean Semi-arid Conditions. Sch. J. Agric. Vet. Sci.5 (3): 166 – 171.

AQUASTAT. 2023. Country Profile – Libya. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy.

Başçiftçi, Z. B. and Kınacı, G. 2015. Investigation on Quality Characters and Correlations Among Hardness with Others in Bread Wheat. GIDA (2015) 40 (4): 187-192.

Carter, B. P., Morris, C. F. and Anderson, J. A. 1999. Optimizing the SDS sedimentation test for end-use quality selection in a soft white and club wheat-breeding program. Cereal Chem 76: 907-911.

Crespo-Herrera, L. A., J. Crossa, J. Huerta-Espino, M. Vargas, S. Mondal, G. Velu, T. S. Payne, H. Braun and R. P. Singh. 2018. Genetic Gains for Grain Yield in CIMMYT’s Semi-Arid Wheat Yield Trials Grown in Suboptimal Environments. Crop Science. 58:1890–1898.

Curic, D., Karlovic, D., Tusak, D., Petrovic, B. and Dugum, J. 2001. Gluten as a Standard of Wheat Flour Quality. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 39 (4): 353–361.

Curtis, B. C., 2002. Wheat in the world. In B. C. Curtis, S. Rajamram and H. Gomez Macpherson, eds. Bread wheat improvement and production. Plant production and protection, Series No. 30. Rome, Italy.

Delibaltova, V., Kirchev, H., Zheliazkov, I. and Dyulgerski, Y. 2014. Investigation on the Yield and Grain Quality of Bread Wheat Varieties in Southeast Bulgaria. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 20 (1): 96-100.

Dhaka V., Gulia, N. and Khatkar, B. S. 2012. Application of Mixolab to Assess the Bread Making Quality of Wheat Varieties. 1 (3): 183-193. doi:10.4172/scientificreports. 183.

FAO. 2022. World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2022. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc2211en.

Faměra, O., Hrušková, M. and Novotná, D. 2004. Evaluation of methods for wheat grain hardness determination . Plant Soil Environ. 50 (11): 489–493.

Heemskerk, W. and Koopmanschap, E. 2012. Agribusiness development in Libya “A fact-finding mission”. Project Report. Centre for Development Innovation, Wageningen UR.

Hruskova, M. and Švecc, I. 2009. Wheat Hardness in Relation to Other Quality Factors. Czech J. Food Sci. 27 (4): 240-248.

ICARDA. 2004. Libya and ICARDA: Ties that Bind, No. 18. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria, 20 pp. En.

ICC. 1994. Standard No: 116/1. Determination of the sedimentation value (according to Zeleny) as an approximate measure of baking quality. International Association for Cereal Science and Technology, Huddinge, Sweden.

Iqbal, Z., Pasha, I., Abrar, M., Masih, S. and Hanif, M. S. 2015. Physico-chemical, Functional and Rheological Properties of Wheat Varieties. J. Agric. Res., 2015, 53 (2): 253-267.

Ortiz-Monasterio, R, J. I. 2002. Nitrogen Management in Irrigated Spring Wheat. In B. C. Curtis, S. Rajamram and H. Gomez Macpherson, eds. Bread wheat improvement and production. Plant production and protection, Series No. 30. Rome, Italy.

Ozturk, A. and Aydin, F. 2004. Effect of Water Stress at Various Growth Stages on Some Quality Characteristics of Winter Wheat. J. Agronomy & Crop Science 190, 93-99.

Pena, R. J. 2002. Wheat for Bread and Other Foods. In B. C. Curtis, S. Rajamram and H. Gomez Macpherson, eds. Bread wheat improvement and production. Plant production and protection, Series No. 30. Rome, Italy.

Rao, D. S., Raghavendra, M., Gill, P., Madan, S. and Munjal, R. 2021. Effect of Drought Stress on Grain Quality Attributes in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties. Biological Forum – An International Journal. 13 (3): 58-63.

Rharrabti, Y., Villegas, D., Royo, C., Martos-Nu´n˜ez, V. and Garcı´a del, M. 2003. Durum wheat quality in Mediterranean environments II. Influence of climatic variables and relationships between quality parameters. Field Crops Research 80: 133–140.

Sakr, N., Rhazi, L. and Aussenac, T. 2021. Bread Wheat Quality under Limiting Environmental Conditions: I-Molecular Properties of Storage Proteins and Starch Constituents in Mature Grains. Agriculture 11, 289-301.

Sameen, A., Niaz, A., and Anjum, F. M. 2002. Chemical Composition of Three Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties as Affected by NPK Doses. Int. J. Agri. Biol., 4 (4): 537- 539.

Tatar, O., Cakalogulları, U., Tonk, F., Istipliler, D. and Karakoc, R. 2020. Effect of Drought Stress on Yield and Quality Traits of Common Wheat During GRAIN Filling Stage. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 25 (1): 236-244.

Tayyar S. 2010.Variation in grain yield and quality of Romanian bread wheat varieties compared to local varieties in northwestern Turkey. Romanian Biotechnological letters. 15 (2): 5189-5196.

VSN International. 2010. GenStat software for windows. Release 14. VSN Intl., Hemel, Hempstead, UK.

Yıldırım, A. and Deger, O. 2021. Physical, physicochemical (technological) and chemical characteristics of common bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties grown in Mardin region. Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 25 (2): 151-162.

Yıldırım, A. and Atasoy, A. F. 2020. Quality characteristics of some durum wheat varieties grown in Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey (GAP). Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 24 (4): 420-431.